グレンデール歴史修正主義訴訟に関するグレンデール市のプレスリリース
地裁と高裁について。
United States District Court (2014/8/11)
http://www.glendaleca.gov/Home/Components/News/News/872/16City of Glendale Prevails in “Comfort Women” Lawsuit
Glendale, CA – United States District Court Judge Percy Anderson recently dismissed a lawsuit against the City of Glendale, which sought the removal of a monument in Glendale’s Central Park that memorializes the more than 200,000 Dutch and Asian women who were coerced into sexual slavery by the Japanese Imperial Army between 1932 and 1945.
The Lawsuit (Michiko Shiota Gingery, et al. v. City of Glendale, et al.) was filed against the City by Michiko Shiota Gingery, a Glendale resident and the so-called Global Alliance for Historical Truth (GAHT-US), a nonprofit corporation. The plaintiffs claimed that the placement of the monument interfered with the Executive Branch’s primary authority to conduct foreign relations and was an unconstitutional interference with the federal government’s Foreign Affairs Power.
In response to the City’s motion to dismiss the case, the court ruled in the City’s favor. Preliminarily, the court ruled that the plaintiffs did not have “standing” to bring suit as they suffered no tangible harm from the City’s placement of the monument in the park. Substantively, the court ruled that the plaintiffs could not articulate a clear conflict between the City’s approval of the monument and the federal government’s policies regarding recognition of the plight of the Comfort Women. The court noted that, even according to the facts in the plaintiffs’ complaint, “Glendale’s placement of the statue is entirely consistent with the federal government’s foreign policy.” The judge also dismissed the plaintiffs’ procedural claim as being outside federal jurisdiction.
Michael Garcia, Glendale’s City Attorney, stated that, “The City Attorney’s Office and the attorneys from Sidley Austin LLP, the firm who provided pro bono legal services to assist the City’s litigation efforts, always believed that this lawsuit was without merit.” He stated, “We are pleased that the Court recognized our City Council’s right to make public pronouncements on matters important to our community.”
Andrew Rawcliffe and Miah Yun of the Glendale City Attorney’s Office defended the City in the case, along with the Sidley Austin team of Bradley H. Ellis, Frank J. Broccolo, Christopher S. Munsey, and Laura L. Richardson.
Los Angeles Superior Court (2015/2/23)
こっちはエミコヤマさんによる「グレンデール市に対し慰安婦像撤去を求める州裁判」の解説 を裏付けるような内容です。
http://www.glendaleca.gov/Home/Components/News/News/1100/16City of Glendale Prevails in Second Comfort Women Lawsuit
GLENDALE, CA – On Monday, February 23, 2015, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael P. Linfield granted a motion by the City of Glendale to dismiss a lawsuit, which sought the removal of a monument in Glendale Central Park that memorializes the more than 200,000 Dutch and Asian women who were coerced into sexual slavery by the Japanese Imperial Army between 1932 and 1945.
The Lawsuit (Michiko Shiota Gingery, et al v. City of Glendale, et al.) was the second lawsuit filed by Michiko Shiota Gingery, a Glendale resident, and the Global Alliance for Historical Truth (GAHT-US), a nonprofit corporation. Late last year, United States District Court Judge Percy Anderson dismissed a similar federal lawsuit brought on behalf of the same plaintiffs. In both lawsuits, the plaintiffs claimed, among other things, that the placement of the monument interfered with the Executive Branch’s primary authority to conduct foreign relations and was an unconstitutional interference with the federal government’s Foreign Affairs Power.
Like Judge Anderson before him, Judge Linfield rejected all of plaintiffs’ arguments and ruled in the City’s favor. In doing so, the Court explained that the Comfort Women monument was not only constitutional but was also a protected exercise of the City’s freedom of speech. As Judge Linfield explained at the outset of his ruling “cities and states have routinely – and historically passed resolutions in support, or in opposition to various foreign policy issues.” “If plaintiffs’ argument were correct then such historically routine activities undertaken by state and local government throughout the Country would all be unconstitutional.” The Judge further stated, “However, Plaintiffs are wrong; such local pronouncements – and this monument – are not unconstitutional.”
The City was represented, pro bono, by a team of litigators at Sidley Austin, including Bradley H. Ellis, Frank J. Broccolo, Christopher S. Munsey, and Laura L. Richardson.
Michael Garcia, Glendale’s City Attorney, stated that “the City is extremely pleased with the result and the thorough and thoughtful ruling by Judge Linfield.” He added “the City is also very appreciative of Sidley Austin’s tireless effort and exceptional representation in this matter.”
